Archive for the ‘Environment’ Category

Additional Sanctions for the Environment Agency

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

Additional Sanctions for Environment Agency
As of the start of this year, the Environment Agency has changed its enforcement and sanctions policy to reflect the introduction of new civil sanction. Specifically, their website states:

“Our Enforcement and sanctions policy has now changed and these documents have been replaced. On 4 January 2011 we introduced new Civil Sanction powers.”

So what does this mean for UK businesses?

The overall aim of the Environment Agency is to safeguard the environment, which includes encouraging businesses to make environmental protection an integral part of business practices.

By following this route, they aim to avoid harm to the environment from ever occurring, which is far preferable to seeking ways of putting right damage that has already been done.

Ideally they want to bring this about by persuasion in the form of information and advice on how businesses can help the environment and, at the same time, often realise tangible benefits themselves from changing their operations.

Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, means that persuasion is often not enough and the Environment Agency has to adopt more hard line forms of enforcement, which might include:

  • Enforcement Notices, Works Notices or Prohibition Notices, which carry legal penalties for any organisation that fails to comply with their requirements.
  • Suspending, revoking or changing the conditions of Environmental Licences
  • Where actual harm to the environment has occurred, the Agency may undertake remedial work and then recover the costs from those who are responsible for causing the damage.

When an incident amounts to an actual criminal offence, the Agency has the option of prosecuting the perpetrator through the courts, although this can involve the Environment Agency in legal battles that can be costly in terms of time as well as financially.

From last year, the Environment Agency has a range of additional sanctions that can be pursued through the civil courts rather than the criminal courts. They don’t see this route as being appropriate for the most serious offences but rather as a lighter touch for those organisations that are trying to comply with environmental legislation.

What do the new civil sanctions include?

  • Additional Notices that can require a business to bring their operations into Compliance with the law within a defined time limit or Restore damage that has been done – again within a specified time limit.
  • A range of monetary penalties imposed by the Agency ranging from fixed amounts associated with minor offences to variable amounts that are based on the nature of the offences where they are considered to be more serious in nature.
  • Enforcement undertakings or Stop Notices that can require an organisation to make amends for damage they have done or to stop their operations completely if they are damaging the environment.

As of the 4th January 2011, the Environment Agency replaced their previous “Enforcement and Prosecution Policy and Functional Guidelines” with a number of new Enforcement Documents:

(Note some of these documents are substantial and may take a while to download)

Environmental compliance need not be a costly affair. In fact, with the right guidance, businesses can usually achieve significant benefits for themselves and their employees.

Why not request a visit from one of our Consultants who can explain what you need to do to become compliant as well as the most cost effective way to do so.

CRC – Energy Efficiency Scheme or is it Taxation?

Monday, October 25th, 2010

It’s all in the melting pot again for the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme

The Original Scheme

In April 2010 we published an article about the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme introduced by the Government to encourage larger users of energy to improve their efficiency.
(see our earlier article).

Very briefly, the idea of the scheme is to sell allowances to around 4,000 of the UK’s largest energy users (i.e. those that use more than 6,000MWh of electricity each year). The energy savings of these organisations would then be monitored and, at the end of each year, entered into a Performance League Table, showing how successful each had been in reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

When first conceived, the scheme was not intended to be a revenue earner for the Government. In fact the overall scheme was intended to be cost neutral, with all the money being returned to the participating organisations in proportion to how high they appeared in the League Table.

Consequently, as well as benefitting from reduced energy bills, those who made the greatest savings would also receive a greater share in the recycled cash.

Obviously, both these factors were important considerations when organisations were budgeting for carbon cutting initiatives.

Recent Changes to the Scheme

Since the recent Government Spending Review, however, the picture has changed dramatically – not by anything in George Osborne’s speech to Parliament but in the fine detail of the report, which includes the following statement:

“The CRC Energy Efficiency scheme will be simplified to reduce the burden on businesses, with the first allowance sales for 2011-12 emissions now taking place in 2012 rather than 2011. Revenues from allowance sales totalling £1 billion a year by 2014-15 will be used to support the public finances, including spending on the environment, rather than recycled to participants. Further decisions on allowance sales are a matter for the Budget process.”

This announcement contains three key statements:

  1. The first sale of allowances will take place in 2012 instead of 2011. Originally each organisation needed to forecast its energy usage for the following year and purchase allowances up-front. The Government now appears to have adopted a simpler approach whereby organisations can purchase allowances after the event, based on actual energy usage.
  2. Revenues from the sale of allowances will no longer be returned to participants but will be retained by the Government. This amounts to a carbon tax on larger energy users in the order of £1 billion pounds a year.
  3. This is not necessarily the end of changes since further decisions about allowance sales are anticipated in the Budget process. Obviously we can only speculate as to what these decisions may be but an obvious consideration is the actual unit cost of the allowances.

These changes can have major implications for investment plans into carbon reduction projects and they also introduce a measure of uncertainty as to what future changes may mean for cost-benefit calculations.

There are other questions raised that organisations need to ponder, for example:

  • The initial sale of allowances has been delayed to 2012, effectively making them retrospective but does this mean that sales for future years will also be retrospective or is this delay only in place while the scheme gets off the ground?
  • What will happen to the Performance League Tables now that one of their primary functions no longer applies?
  • Might there be changes in the criteria for which organisations are to be participants in the scheme?

Advice and Guidance

The Government claims to have simplified the scheme but energy calculations for larger organisations can be complex and there continues to be uncertainly as to how this affects those organisations that are members of larger groups, which is why we continue to offer our Carbon Reduction Commitment Health Check.

If you need any help or advice regarding energy efficiency, then please don’t hesitate to contact Andrew Nicholson who heads up our Environment Business Unit. (see contact details).

Health and Safety has been Reviewed but
What Does it Mean for You?

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

Lord Young's Report

Lord Young has published his eagerly anticipated review of Health and Safety in the UK. Perhaps understandably, it has barely been noticed by the media, which has been pre-occupied with other weighty reports such as the reviews of Security, Defence and, of course, Spending.

For UK organisations, the immediate question is how this might affect them.

The report opens with a positive message about the real benefits of Health and Safety for UK workplaces, which now have the lowest number of non-fatal accidents and the second lowest number of fatal accidents in Europe.

Areas of Criticism

Interestingly for anyone who thinks about Health and Safety in terms of legislation, the report contains little of a critical nature. Instead, most of Lord Young’s criticism is reserved for such areas as:

  • Influence of European Union legislators
  • Poor practice on the part of unqualified Health and Safety consultants
  • Application of the full weight of legislation across all sectors regardless of hazard levels.
  • Demands on industry by insurance companies
  • Bureaucracy around the practical application of legislation
  • Misrepresentation of Health and Safety in the media
  • Operation of Claims Management companies

Perhaps the strongest criticism of Lord Young’s report is directed at the last of these, which has given rise to the perception of a Compensation Culture and the assumption that for every accident someone must be held responsible and compensation is payable.

The fear of being sued is even discouraging ordinary folk from trying to help people who have been injured in case their efforts don’t work.

Practical Experience

Interestingly one of our own readers, a businessman from Dorset, has expressed some of the frustrations he has experienced as a result of poor practice in the application of health and safety:

“I decided to retire early from the construction industry due to Health and Safety legislation and attitudes.

As a building contractor in a family run business of three generations, I recently carried out a risk assessment on myself as a company director incurring a serious or fatal injury within my business.

It transpires that it makes no difference whom I employ as a Health and Safety advisor, what advice I seek and follow, whatever qualifications relating to Health and safety and site management any of my employees may have. If a serious or fatal occurrence were to happen on any of my sites in the eyes of the HSE “IT’S THE BOSS’S FAULT”

Why is this? I ask amongst my peers. More revenue by way of management fines appears to be the answer.”

Although expressed differently, Lord Young’s report includes many frustrations with the practical application of legislation that is well intentioned and in many respects very successful.

What are the implications?

For the most part, Health and Safety legislation is sound and we believe when it is properly applied is of real benefit to employers and employees alike. Whilst there may be some consolidation of the legislation, it is unlikely to happen any time soon.

Perhaps this report will act as a wakeup call to those who have unjustifiably used Health and Safety as an excuse for avoiding something they simply don’t want to do, or who have failed to use common sense in the application of Health and Safety.

Increased regulation may be on the cards for Consultants though that is likely to take time to get up and running. In the meantime, it is incumbent on everyone to examine the reputation, qualifications and experience of anyone they hire to provide Health and Safety advice.

We all need to be more cautious about how Health and Safety is reported in the media. A bit of healthy scepticism wouldn’t go amiss.

Perhaps it’s the Claims Management companies that need to be looking most carefully at the risks that might arise from this report.

Read the full text of Lord Young’s Report

Green Deal for Business

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

We have written before about energy saving initiatives that are mainly targeted at larger organisations. The Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) is one example.


As an urgent reminder, if yours is an obligated organisation under the CRC initiative the deadline of the 30th September for registration is virtually upon us. There are still many companies that have yet to register and failing to do so can attract hefty fines.


We now hear that the coalition government is proposing to help the much larger number of small and medium sized companies to realise energy savings. If it goes ahead then we expect it to be included in the Energy Bill – due to be announced in November.

Basically, the scheme will involve the government in setting up a fund that will be administered through the banks and from which organisations can borrow money to upgrade their plant and equipment for greater efficiency. Loans will then be repaid out of savings from the increased efficiency. Repayments could also be automated through the energy providers so that there is little or no impact on the individual companies themselves.

Overall, it could be a win-win situation for companies wanting to save money, the government wanting to reduce carbon emissions and even for the banks who have an obligation to increase their lending to businesses.

The challenge will be to keep what essentially is a very simple idea free is from bureaucracy that could be off-putting for smaller organisations. Otherwise, up to four million businesses could benefit from the scheme by replacing old heating and cooling systems, air conditioning, lighting, and other poor efficiency equipment.

Smaller organisations often do not have the time or the information needed to properly assess their energy usage or to devise viable strategies to improve their performance in a cost-effective manner. For some years, EDP has been advising organisations of all sizes on how they are able to improve their carbon footprint and improve energy efficiency. We will be closely following this proposal to ensure our clients are able to gain maximum benefit from it.

ShareThis

Contact EDP HS&E Consultants for all your health, safety and environment needs. We can check your current arrangements and advise you about any changes or improvements you need to make.

To discuss your requirements, without any obligation on your part, please gives us a call on 01744 766000 or complete the Enquiry Form on our website.

EDP implements ISO 14001 for Microsoft Ltd

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Specialist Health, Safety and Environment Consultancy, EDP announces the successful implementation of the Environmental Management System Standard ISO 14001 for Microsoft Ltd’s Real Estate and Facilities function within the UK.

Operating throughout the UK, EMEA and South East Asia, EDP has been a Microsoft Ltd vendor for over 17 years on a number of projects and continues to handle all of Microsoft Ltd’s health, safety and environmental management requirements in the UK.

Certification to ISO 14001 ensures that Microsoft Ltd has an environmental management system in place which is maintained to a high standard in order to conform to the improvement goals documented in the company’s UK Statement of Intent on Environmental Sustainability. The Standard demonstrates compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and allows Microsoft Ltd to demonstrate to key business stakeholders that the company is taking a pro-active approach to the management and reduction of its environmental impacts.

For further information please submit your enquiry here or visit our website at www.edp-uk.com

(more…)

The Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme – A Brief Guide

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

The Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (previously known as the Carbon Reduction Commitment or CRC) is a regulatory incentive designed to encourage and improve energy efficiency in large public and private sector organisations. The scheme is mandatory, and, as well as improving energy efficiency, it aims to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) being emitted into the atmosphere.

This is part of the UK Government’s commitment to achieve its reduction targets for greenhouse gases.

EDP Health, Safety and Environment Consultants have produce a guide to CRC entitled: The Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme – A Brief Guide which is now available to download.


Click to download the CRC Guide from EDP

For Health, Safety and Environmental solutions for larger organisations, please visit the EDP Health Safety & Environment Consultants website for more information from EDP Health and Safety Consultants about outsourcing Health and Safety , health and safety training courses: www.edp-uk.com


Do You Need A Carbon Reduction Commitment Health Check?

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

The deadline date of 30th September 2010 for companies to submit energy consumption data to the Environment Agency under the Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) is fast approaching, but the latest information from the Environment Agency shows that only a small proportion of obligated organisations have submitted their data.

All organisations whose electricity use was measured through at least one half hourly meter (HHM) during calendar year 2008 will be required by law to submit data to the Environment Agency before the end of September deadline. (more…)

Why should I concern myself with environmental issues

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

You have legal obligations but you probably already know about them. How about the public’s perception of your organisation or the view of your competitors or, perhaps more importantly, your current and potential clients.

Click here for more information about Environmental Services offered by EDP Health, Safety & Environment Consultants. (more…)

Health Implications of the Volcanic Ash Cloud

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Employers may be wondering if the cloud of volcanic ash, which is currently causing so much havoc for air travel throughout the UK and much of Europe, has any health implications for their employees. (more…)

The CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme is upon us – Are you ready?

Monday, April 19th, 2010

How much do you know about the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme?

The scheme won’t affect all organisations – at least not in its present form – but If you are a large user of energy, then you may well be included. (more…)